2025 Domestic Large Model Panoramic Comparison: DeepSeek vs GLM vs Qwen
Background
In 2025, domestic large models entered the second half of the "Hundred Models War". DeepSeek, Zhipu GLM, and Tongyi Qianwen each have their strengths. How should developers choose?
This article provides a comprehensive horizontal comparison from four dimensions: reasoning ability, Chinese understanding, code generation, and price.
Contestants
| Model | Vendor | Positioning |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 | DeepSeek | Flagship All-rounder |
| GLM-5 | Zhipu AI | Chinese Specialization |
| Qwen-Plus | Alibaba Tongyi | King of Cost-effectiveness |
Reasoning Ability
DeepSeek V4 performs best in mathematical reasoning and logical deduction. It maintains a leading position on benchmarks such as GSM8K and MATH.
GLM-5 excels in common sense reasoning within Chinese contexts, making it suitable for scenarios requiring deep understanding of Chinese semantics.
Qwen-Plus has balanced reasoning capabilities, fully sufficient for everyday Q&A scenarios.
🏆 Reasoning Ability Ranking: DeepSeek V4 > GLM-5 ≈ Qwen-Plus
Chinese Understanding
GLM-5 has a natural advantage in Chinese understanding tasks—performs best in classical Chinese translation, idiom comprehension, Chinese NLU, etc.
Qwen-Plus benefits from Alibaba's rich Chinese corpus, producing fluent and natural Chinese text.
DeepSeek V4 also has first-class Chinese capabilities, but slightly lags behind GLM-5 in extremely refined Chinese tasks.
🏆 Chinese Understanding Ranking: GLM-5 > Qwen-Plus ≈ DeepSeek V4
Code Generation
DeepSeek V4 is far ahead in code generation capabilities. It significantly outperforms on code benchmarks such as HumanEval and MBPP.
Qwen-Plus has good code generation quality, suitable for daily development assistance.
GLM-5 performs average on general code tasks.
🏆 Code Ability Ranking: DeepSeek V4 >> Qwen-Plus > GLM-5
Price Comparison
| Model | Input/1K tokens | Output/1K tokens | Cost-effectiveness |
|---|---|---|---|
| deepseek-v4 | ¥0.002 | ¥0.008 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| glm-5 | ¥0.002 | ¥0.008 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| qwen-plus | ¥0.001 | ¥0.004 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
Model Selection Guide
Choose DeepSeek V4 when you need:
- Complex code generation and debugging
- Mathematical reasoning and logical analysis
- High-quality technical documentation writing
Choose GLM-5 when you need:
- Chinese content creation (copywriting, translation, polishing)
- Long text comprehension and summarization
- In-depth analysis in Chinese context
Choose Qwen-Plus when you need:
- High-frequency calls, budget-sensitive scenarios
- Daily Q&A and customer service systems
- Large-scale text processing
Ultimate solution: choose auto
Ciyuano's automatic routing will automatically select the optimal model based on your request content, real-time load and health status of each channel.
Summary
There is no "best" model, only the "best for the task" model. The value of Ciyuano lies in: one integration, switch anytime, always use the most suitable one at the moment.
📖 Related Articles
DeepSeek V4: A Milestone in Domestic Large Models
DeepSeek V4 is the latest flagship large model launched by the DeepSeek team, achieving significant improvements in multiple dimensions such as reasoning, coding, and Chinese. This article will comprehensively analyze its core capabilities, performance, and integration methods.
Tech FrontierRAG in Practice: Building an Enterprise Knowledge Base with LangChain + Vector Database
Build an enterprise knowledge base system based on RAG from scratch, enabling AI to accurately answer internal company questions.
Tech FrontierRAG System Design: Empowering Large Models with Real-time Knowledge Capabilities
In-depth explanation of the design principles and implementation of RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) systems, including vector retrieval, hybrid search, re-ranking, and evaluation framework.
💬 Comments are not yet available, stay tuned